跪求英语高手帮我外文翻译。用软件翻译再帮我改一改也行。我邮箱[email protected]。我qq号:438764864

Abstract. A recent study on the environmental impact of automatic fire sprinklers is
documented in a two part series. The present paper examines the relationship of
automatic fire sprinkler technology to environmental sustainability. Large-scale fire
tests were conducted using identically constructed and furnished living rooms. In one
test, fire extinguishment was achieved solely by fire service intervention, and in the
other, a single residential automatic fire sprinkler was used to control the fire until
final extinguishment was achieved by the fire service. Comparisons of the total green-
house gas production, quantity of water required to extinguish the fire, quality of
water runoff, potential impact of wastewater runoff on groundwater and surface
water, and mass of materials requiring disposal between the two tests were made. The
results show that in addition to providing life safety and limiting property damage,
the use of automatic fire sprinklers is a key factor in achieving sustainability.
Keywords: Risk factors, Environmental impact, Greenhouse gas emissions

1.

Introduction and Background

Current efforts to improve sustainability

of new or existing

buildings are focused

on achieving improvements during normal operations. The importance and contri-
bution of risk factors, i.e., the potential for hazards and their consequences, for
achieving sustainable development has been assessed in two recent studies [1, 2].
Included in these studies are assessments of the lifecycle carbon emissions (LCE)
for office and residential buildings, and moderate hazard industrial facilities. The
impact of risk factors on lifecycle carbon emission, LCE, is illustrated in Figure 1.
The plot indicates the carbon emission for a building as a function of time. Note
that proportions are not to scale, but are expanded for readability. The lower
curve may be considered the carbon emissions under normal conditions; the upper
curve shows the deviation from that of normal conditions due to a fire.
For residential occupancies, the contribution of fire risk to the total lifecycle
carbon emissions of a home without sprinklers is between 0.4% and 3.7%. The
contribution of a fire risk to the total lifecycle carbon emissions of a home is
reduced to 0.2% when sprinklers are used, as all large fires are eliminated [3].
* Correspondence should be addressed to: Christopher J. Wieczorek, E-mail: Christopher.wieczorek@
FMGlobal.com

抽象的。最近的一项研究对环境的影响、消防自动洒水器浇花

记录在一个两部分系列。本文所建立的关系进行了实证分析

自动消防喷淋技术环境的可持续发展。大型火灾

试验是使用同构造和布置客厅。在一个

实现了测试、火extinguishment完全是由消防服务部门的干预,并在

其他的,一个单一的住宅自动消防喷淋系统被用来控制火势,直到

最后extinguishment消防服务,达到了。绿色-总数的比较

天然气生产、数量的房子水灭火,所需的质量

径流,径流潜在影响地下水和废水的表面

和大众的水处理材料之间的两种测试要求。这

结果表明,除了提供生命安全及限制财产损失,

火灾自动洒水装置的使用是一项关键因素在于实现可持续发展。

关键词:危险因素、环境影响、温室气体的排放

1。

介绍和背景

现在的努力来提高可持续发展能力

新的或现有的

建筑集中

在正常操作实现改进。工作的重要性,contri -

bution风险因素的基础上,即,潜在的危害及其后果,因为

实现可持续发展已被评估过在最近的两项研究[1,2]。

包括在这些研究受到生命周期评价的发展现状,二氧化碳排放量)

对于办公室和住宅建筑工业设施,适量的危害。这

生命周期影响评价危险因素对碳的排放特性,说明了,在图1中。

指出了碳排放的情节申请建筑作为时间的函数。注

不,比例扩大规模,但对可读性。较低的

曲线也可以被认为是正常条件下的碳排放量;上部

曲线出现偏差的正常条件下由于一场火灾的。

为住宅租金,火灾风险的贡献与总生命周期

一个家的碳排放量之间没有洒水器浇0.4%和3.7%。这

火灾风险的贡献与总生命周期碳排放的家乡

减少为0.2%时,因为所有喷头使用大型火灾是消除[3]。

*来函,请寄给Wieczorek:克里斯托弗,电子邮件:Christopher.wieczorek@ >

FMGlobal.com
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考