请帮我把这篇中文翻译成英文,非常感谢！越快越好！

Question

盘点2009年，轰动全国的教育新闻事件层出不穷。这些事件，几乎都与教育公平有关。21世纪教育研究院院长杨东平教授说，作为社会公正“调节器”之一的教育如果也“嫌贫爱富”，就会加剧公众的社会不公正感和被剥夺感。

在北京大学只把橄榄枝伸向少数名牌中学的精英学生时，作为世界一流大学的哈佛、耶鲁、弗吉尼亚大学等高校，不论公立还是私立，每年都会主动投入资源到最穷、最弱势的阶层和地区，说服那些自己也不相信能上这种大学的穷学生申请。因为他们的理念是，如果大学还不能给他们改变自己命运的机会的话，那他们永远没有改变命运的可能性。正如培根说过的：“只要维持公平的教育机会，贫穷就不会变成世袭。”

在美国，由耶鲁、哈佛等名校毕业生们发起的大学巅峰计划，专门帮助那些低收入家庭的孩子提高学业，教会他们如何申请大学，以此来缩小低收入家庭和中高收入家庭子女大学升学的差异，从而更好地促进教育公平。这个计划的出台，仅仅是因为这些毕业生在社会机构服务时，发现贫困家庭的孩子考不上大学并非因为他们的能力或者智力低下，而是因为他们不是在一个上大学的家庭氛围或者社区氛围中长大。

旅美学者薛涌称：“北大的实名推荐，应该到中国的贫穷地区去搞，去最穷困、最破落、甚至几乎没有严格意义的学校的地方去寻找人才，让那些人均教育经费只有一两百元的优秀学生有机会上北大，而不是把推荐权交给某些已经处于教育强势地位的中学校长。一方面，这可以平衡教育资源，另一方面，北大要培养的是社会领袖，如果招的都是从小家境富裕，上补习班，与世隔绝，一帆风顺进入精英阶层的人，这些孩子在一起，能碰撞出什么火花来？”

我国的教育资源本来就分配不平衡，而现在一些名校的招生政策，看似给了更多人才脱颖而出的机会，但实际并没有在学校之间和学生之间形成真正的公平。而一旦这些政策被滥用，将会加剧教育的不公平。

“虽然公平永远是相对的，但是在社会发展初级阶段，不管是大学还是政府，都应该追求更高层次上的公平”，复旦大学高等教育研究所所长熊庆年教授如此评述。他认为，现在存在的种种教育怪象，是因为我国处于发展的初级阶段，过于关注发展的速度而忽视了公平。只有教育机构本身重视教育公平，才有可能出现中国自己的大学巅峰计划。
请不要用翻译软件。最好是大四或研究生翻译

Answer 1

Looking retrospectly for 2009, a series news events on the education came out one another. These events, almost all related with the equality of education.Professor Yang Dongping,the president of the 21st Century Education Research Institute, said that education as one of the "regulators"of social justice, if also "flatter the rich and desert the poor" ,would aggravate the public sense of social injustice and the sense of deprivation.

Every year,as Peking University stretched its olive branches only to the small number of elite students in some famous high schools,world-class universities such as Harvard, Yale, University of Virginia and other colleges and universities, whether public or private, will take the initiative to devote resources to the poorest and most vulnerable stages and regions to convince those who even do not believe that can apply for such kind of university. Because their philosophy is, if the university does not give them the opportunity to change their own destiny, then they would not possibly change their fate forever. As Bacon said: "If we can maintain a fair access to education, poverty will not become hereditary."

In the United States, graduates from Yale, Harvard and other elite universities who launched a so-called Peak Program, devoting to helping children from low-income families with their studies, teaching them how to apply for universities, in order to narrow the gap of kids' studies between the low-income families and middle-income or high-income families and better promote fairness in education.The reason for this program's introdution is only because that these graduates ,when they served in the social organizations, found that the reason why children from the poor families can’t apply for universities is not for their abilities or low-mentality, but for they live in families and communities have no such atmosphere.

Xue Yong,a chinese scholar living in America, said: "the real-name-recommendation system of the Peking University , should be to launch in China's poor areas, to the poorest, most dilapidated or in the places that meaningless, to search talents and let those excellent students who only have one or two hundred yuan on educational appropriations per people, but rather not to be recommended by some secondary school principals whose school has already strong-equipped education .On the one hand, this can be a balance of educational resources, on the other hand,Peking University focus on training the community leaders, if recruit students from well-off families,who go to cram schools and isolated with society since then, they will easily get into the elite class ,how can these children impact sparks together? "

China already uneven distribution of educational resources, and now a number of famous schools admissions policy appears to give more people opportunities to demostrate themselves, but the reality is not that fair between schools and students. Once these policies abuse,it will aggravate the unfairness of education.

"Although the fairness is always relative, but in the primary stage of social development, whether the university or the government, all should pursue a higher level of fairness ",the Director of Fudan University Institute of Higher Education, Professor Xiong Qingnian once commented. In his view, nowadays there still exist many eccentric educational phenomenons, the reason is that China's development is still at its early stage , neglecting of the fairness since we too concerned about the speed of development. only the educational institutions themselves value the education fairness, can we chinese Universities have our own Peak Program.

Answer 2

Inventory in 2009, a sensation on the education news event after another. These events, almost all equity-related education. 21st Century Education Research Institute, said Professor Yang Dongping, a social justice, "regulator" of education if they also "Xianpinaifu" will increase the public sense of social injustice and the sense of deprivation.
Peking University, stretched an olive branch in a small number of brand-name only the elite high school student, as a world-class universities such as Harvard, Yale, University of Virginia and other colleges and universities, whether public or private, will take the initiative each year to devote resources to the poorest and most vulnerable sectors and regions to convince those who do not believe that the poor can, on application by students of this university. Because their philosophy is, if the university does not give them the opportunity to change their own destiny, then they will never change the fate of the possibilities. As Bacon said: "If we can maintain a fair access to education, poverty will not become hereditary."

In the United States, from Yale, Harvard and other elite university graduates who launched the peak of programs designed to help low-income families to improve school children, teach them how to apply for universities, in order to reduce the low-income families and middle-income children of the family studies university differences, in order to better promote fairness in education. The introduction of this scheme only because these graduates in the social sector services, the families of the children not pass the test to identify where poverty is not without because of their ability or mental low, but because they were not the family atmosphere of a Shang university or community atmosphere grow up.

Xue Yong-American scholar, said: "Beijing's real name recommendation, should be to engage in China's poor areas, to the poorest, most dilapidated and hardly in the strict sense of the school's place to find talent for those who only 12 per capita education Jingfei hundred excellent opportunity for students at Beijing University, and not recommended in the hands of some of the already strong position in the education of secondary school principals. On the one hand, this can be a balance of educational resources, on the other hand, Beijing University to train the community leaders, if strokes are small well-off, the cram schools, isolated, smooth sailing into the elite class of people, these children together, can impact what sparks come out? "

China already uneven distribution of educational resources, and now a number of elite schools admissions policy appears to give more people opportunities to come to the fore, but the reality is not between schools and students in between the really fair. Once the abuse of these policies will aggravate the unfairness of education.

"Although the fair is always yes relative, but in the initial stage of social development, Bu Guan of the University or the Government, all should pursue a higher level Gong Ping", Fudan University Gaodengjiaoyu Yanjiu Suo, director Professor Xiong Qingnian this comment. He believes that the various education Guaixiang now exists is because in the early stage of development in China, too concerned about the speed of development to the neglect of the fair. Only educational institutions themselves emphasis on education fair, only the University may be the peak of China's own plans.

不知道 对不对 可以参考下吧本回答被网友采纳

Answer 3

Inventory 2009, a national education news events to emerge in endlessly. These events with education fairness, almost all concerned. The 21st century YangDongPing education research institute, said professor as social justice "stabilizer" of education ", "if XianPinAiFu will aggravate the public interest and the social injustice deprived.

The olive branch in Beijing university only to a few high school students, as the elite world-class university of Virginia university, harvard, Yale university, etc, in both the public and private, active input resources every year to the poorest and most vulnerable and region, persuade those who don't believe in this university students. The idea is that because they can't give them if the university to change your fate, they never change your fate. As the bacon said: "as long as it is to maintain a fair chance of education, the poor will not become a hereditary."

In the United States, the elite of Yale, Harvard University graduates are initiated, designed to help those peak plan to improve school children of low-income families, and teach them how to apply for university, so as to narrow low-income families with higher income difference, the college bound to promote education fair better. This plan, just because the graduates in social service, found that children from poor families in university is not because they are unable or mental retardation, but because they are not in a university or community atmosphere family atmosphere.

Commenting on XueChong scholars said: "the new Peking, should to China's recommendation to poor areas, to the poorest and most dogs, hardly even strictly for the school where talents and make the education funds only 89 yuan per capita of outstanding student at Peking University, organic, rather than the recommended to have some education in the dominant position of high school principal. On the one hand, it can balance the education resources, on the other hand, the society is to cultivate the leader, if all is rich, and isolated, sailing into cram schools, these elite child together, could spark a what?"

China's education resources was unbalanced allocation, and now some school admissions policies, seem to be given more talents to stand out, but isn't at school students formed between the real and the fair. But once these abuse, will aggravate the unfair education.

"Although fair is always relative, but in social development phase, university or government, all should pursue higher levels of fair", higher education research institute of fudan university professor so XiongQing. He thinks, now there are various education in China, because the blame at the primary stage, the speed of development too much attention and ignore the fair. Only education institution itself value education fairness, there may be China's top university plans.

Answer 4

翻译：Inventory 2009, a national education news events to emerge in endlessly. These events with education fairness, almost all concerned. The 21st century YangDongPing education research institute, said professor as social justice "stabilizer" of education ", "if XianPinAiFu will aggravate the public interest and the social injustice deprived.

The olive branch in Beijing university only to a few high school students, as the elite world-class university of Virginia university, harvard, Yale university, etc, in both the public and private, active input resources every year to the poorest and most vulnerable and region, persuade those who don't believe in this university students. The idea is that because they can't give them if the university to change your fate, they never change your fate. As the bacon said: "as long as it is to maintain a fair chance of education, the poor will not become a hereditary."

In the United States, the elite of Yale, Harvard University graduates are initiated, designed to help those peak plan to improve school children of low-income families, and teach them how to apply for university, so as to narrow low-income families with higher income difference, the college bound to promote education fair better. This plan, just because the graduates in social service, found that children from poor families in university is not because they are unable or mental retardation, but because they are not in a university or community atmosphere family atmosphere.

Commenting on XueChong scholars said: "the new Peking, should to China's recommendation to poor areas, to the poorest and most dogs, hardly even strictly for the school where talents and make the education funds only 89 yuan per capita of outstanding student at Peking University, organic, rather than the recommended to have some education in the dominant position of high school principal. On the one hand, it can balance the education resources, on the other hand, the society is to cultivate the leader, if all is rich, and isolated, sailing into cram schools, these elite child together, could spark a what?"

China's education resources was unbalanced allocation, and now some school admissions policies, seem to be given more talents to stand out, but isn't at school students formed between the real and the fair. But once these abuse, will aggravate the unfair education.

"Although fair is always relative, but in social development phase, university or government, all should pursue higher levels of fair", higher education research institute of fudan university professor so XiongQing. He thinks, now there are various education in China, because the blame at the primary stage, the speed of development too much attention and ignore the fair. Only education institution itself value education fairness, there may be China's top university plans.