求帮忙翻译~~尽快哦~~谢谢谢谢~~好的话加分哦~~

1.The changes brought by the Renaissance at first affected only a tiny segment of the European population.The great mass of peasants had little awareness that something new was happening in the cities among the elite.But eventually its values would be imposed on or willingly adopted by increasing numbers,as the social and economic conditions changed in Europe and around the world.The new secularism and individualism of the Renaissance made people less willing to accept the doctrine that salvation was possible only through the Catholic church.That salvation was a personal natter,one between the individual and God,was the central issue of the Reformation,and coalesced with the humanist confidence in making one's own way on the basis of merit and virtue.
2.Once Luther's break with the church had succeeded,the dam had burst,and other sects appeared.However,none of the religious reformers,except some radical Protestants,believed in religious freedom.Religion might be a personal matter,but,according to them,truth had been established by God and set down in Scripture,and it was not open to question.The Lutherans and Catholics now resigned themselves to a coexistence that was more or less peaceful;they turned on others like the Calvinists and the Anabaptists,who had not established themselves on the field of battle.In time,there were too many sects to be fought.Religious freedom was a radical idea even as late as the eighteenth century,at the time of the drafting of the Untied States Constitution.But by then,in North America at least,there was such a diversity of religions that it was easier to accept all than to choose one state religion.Thus,religious freedom was an unintended outcome of the Reformation,just as the United States was the unexpected result of the rise of national in Europe and their eventual expansion into worldwide empires.
可以拜托不要用翻译工具直接翻吗?翻得好的真的会给附加分的哦~~

文艺复兴时期的所带来的变化在第一只影响一个小段的欧洲人口。大量的农民几乎没有意识到新的东西正在发生在城市在精英。但最终会对其价值或自愿采用日益增加,社会和经济条件的不同而变化,在欧洲和世界各地。新的世俗主义和个人主义文艺复兴时期的人使人们不愿意接受救恩是可能牵涉到只有通过天主教教会。这是一个个人natter救恩,两者之间的关系,个人和神的核心问题,并由改革与“以人为本”的信心使自己的的基础上的优点和美德。
2。海德的一次打破教会成功了,水坝被冲垮,其他的教派出现了。然而,所有的宗教改革家们,除了一些激进的新教徒,相信宗教自由。宗教可能是一个私人的事情,但是,根据他们的说法,制定了真理的神,记下在《圣经》,这是不对外开放的问题。路德教的教徒和天主教徒已辞职自己共处,或多或少是和平,他们打开别人喜欢加尔文主意者和Anabaptists建立自己的人在战场上。在一段时间后,有太多的教派要打。宗教信仰自由是一个过激的想法,甚至直到18世纪,当时对大多数美国起草的宪法。但是那时,至少在北美洲,有这么多不同的宗教,它比较容易接受比选择一个国教。因此,宗教信仰自由是一个意想不到的结果的改革,正如美国是始料未及的国家的崛起在欧洲和最终成为国际帝国扩张。
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2011-06-15
将英语译成中文

1.由起初,带来了文艺复兴只影响了欧洲population.The农民群众的伟大微小变化不大1段认识到一些新的东西是发生在城市之间的最终它的价值将被征收或自愿elite.But通过增加在欧洲改变了社会和经济条件的数字,并围绕得到世上新文艺复兴时期的世俗主义和个人主义的通过使人们不愿意接受的理论,只有通过拯救天主教church.That可能是个人的拯救瞎扯,个人与上帝的,是改革的核心问题,并与在使一个人的对自己的优点和美德的基础上联合起来的方式以人为本的信心。
2.Once路德与教会的突破已经成功,三峡大坝已经破灭,appeared.However其他教派,除了一些激进的新教徒的宗教freedom.Religion认为,宗教的改革者没有,可能是个人的事,但是,根据他们设立了真相,并设置由上帝在圣经失望,它是不开放question.The lutherans和天主教徒现在辞职自己共存这是或多或少和平,他们在诸如加尔文和其他人的anabaptists转过身来,谁没有建立在battle.In时间字段本身,也有许多教派被fought.Religious自由是一个激进的想法甚至在十八世纪后期在美国的主流派Constitution.But起草时,届时,在北美,至少有这样的宗教,这是比较容易接受的所有选择,而不是一个国家religion.Thus,宗教自由是一个多元化的改革意想不到的结果,正如美国是意想不到结果在欧洲兴起的国家和他们的帝国最终扩大到全世界。
相似回答