第1个回答 2011-01-20
As the representative of Australia, I completely oppose that we donate one hundred billion for the following reasons:
First, Our country is located in the south of eastern hemisphere, away from other continents, so maritime trade is not convenient.In addition, we are bound to protect rare animals. And our country has an inclination of decline of economy, making it difficult for us to take out one hundred billion.
Besides, though some countries are called developing countries, they have had the tendency to supreme developed countries. We cannot deny the possibility of wars carried out by these countries. Hence, if we patron them, our international status cannot be guaranteed.
Third, our country, though, disagree with this proposal, we can patron some backward countries, such as South Africa, India, etc. We bear the responsibility of offering help to them.
注意：一楼和二楼是用软件翻译的，句子都不通！！！！！！！！！！
第2个回答 2011-01-20
I am a representative of Australia .I firmly opposed donate money to the developing countries 100 billion,For the following reasons :
1. Australia located in the south of the Eastern Hemisphere, Far from every continents.Maritime trade is very not easy. We undertakes the responsibility that protect the rare animals , For many years the economic has fallen , now, taking out 100 blillion really difficult .
2. Although some developing countries with the developing countries name , But all aspects of them has the catch up with and surpass up the developed countries trend. we don't eliminate willful waging war may . so. if we funded them, our status will no guarantee .
3. Although our country disagree this proposal ,but we will funded some poor countries. such as The South Africa , The India etc. we will obligatory help them.
第3个回答 2011-01-20
Translate the following words
As the representative of Australia, and resolutely opposed to donate 100 billion to developing countries for the following reasons:
1. Australia is located in the southern hemisphere, away from all continents, sea trade very inconvenient. We are also charged with the responsibility of protecting the rare animals over the years has become a downward trend in the economy, then, it is very difficult to come up with 100 billion.
2. Some developing countries while we have a developing country, but all aspects of the developed countries the trend has been catching up. We do not rule out the possibility of their intention to wage war, so that if funding them, and our position there is no protection.
3. Although China does not agree with this proposal, but can fund some backward countries, such as South Africa and India. We duty-bound to help them.
That's it, please look here, this is our first statement of a simulation activities for the above, please do not evaluate and information, thank you
第4个回答 2011-01-20
I represent as Australia, firmly opposed to developing countries to donate4 money 1000 billion, for the following reasons:
1. Australia is located in south eastern hemisphere, away from the continents, maritime trade great unconvenience. We will shoulder the responsibility of protection of the rare animals for many years, the economy has into decline, at this time, take out 1000 billion really difficult.
2. Some developing countries while called developing country, but all aspects of developed countries have surpassing trend. We don't exclude the possibility of war they purpose, so if they be funded, our position is not guaranteed.
3. Although our country does not agree to such a proposal, but can grant a few backward countries, such as South Africa, India, etc. We must be duty-bound to help them.